
Fixed-term employment contracts are as the name implies, an employment contract concluded to commence on a specified date and shall terminate on another determined or specified date.
At what point then, does an employer use this type of contract inappropriately and what are the consequences in such instances?
The Labour Relations Act, 66 of 1995 (LRA) specifies certain instances where there can be reasonable usage of a fixed-term contract such as the temporary replacing of an employee who is on maternity leave or the duration for the completion of a particular project being limited.
It is therefore appropriate to employ a person on a fixed-term basis if the employer has a fixed-term need.
The LRA provides in Section 186 (1) (b) (i) that an employee who was employed on a Fixed-Term contract can be deemed to be dismissed if the employee reasonably expected the employer to renew the contract on the same or similar terms but the employer renews on less favourable terms or fails to renew it.
It was held in the Labour Court that should an employer permit an employee to continue working beyond the expiry of a fixed-term contract, the contract is deemed to have been tacitly renewed on the same terms and conditions, but for an indefinite period. (Owen and Others v Department of Health, KwaZulu-Natal (2009) 30 ILJ 2461 (LC).
In Gubevu Security Group (Pty) Ltd v Ruggiero NO & others (2011) 20 LC, an employee continued to work a month after the fixed-term period had concluded. She was informed that the month would serve as her notice period after which there would not be renewal of her contract. The court interpreted the tacit renewal to be on the same or similar terms as the previous contract (being three months) but found that the terms of the fixed-term contract could not give rise to an expectation of indefinite employment.
This implies that an employee can have reasonable expectation for the fixed-term contract to be renewed on the same or similar terms or a renewal for an indefinite period according to the circumstances.
The Labour Court in SA Rugby (Pty) Ltd v Commission of Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration 2006 27 ILJ 1041 (LC), held that the notion of a reasonable expectation calls for an objective inquiry to determine whether the facts proved would lead a reasonable employee to expect renewal. Facts relevant to that inquiry include:
The Labour Court held that the employer is obliged to inform the employee of the intention to not renew the contract before expiry of the fixed term. It was further held that a clause in the employment contract which automatically terminates the contract upon conclusion thereof cannot override a change in circumstances which would give rise to a reasonable expectation for renewal on part of the employee.
It is unfortunate that many an employer or employee are not aware of the effects of either failing to renew a fixed-term contract or continuously renewing such a contract and how doing so could play a role in creating an expectation of renewal.
Section 198B of the LRA requires that there be a justifiable reason for entering into the employment relationship on a fixed term basis longer than three months, rather than on a permanent basis. Section 198B (4) sets out some justifiable reasons for entering into a fixed term contract of employment. The reasons may include:
These were tested in a matter which came before the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA). In Loliwe v Hanover Cleaning Services – (2019) CCMA, Loliwe was employed as a general worker for about three years on a series of monthly fixed-term contracts, which were repeatedly renewed. However, when the last contract was not renewed, and Loliwe claimed that his employment had simply ended, he claimed that he had been unfairly dismissed. The CCMA found that Loliwe had become permanently employed by virtue of section 198B of the LRA, which deems employees employed on fixed-term contracts earning below a stipulated amount for longer than three months to be indefinitely employed.
Although he had entered into a number of monthly fixed-term contracts, these contracts did not specify the dates of commencement and termination of the relevant terms. The renewals were also not linked to one of the justifiable reasons required under section 198B. Loliwe had, therefore, been dismissed and the CCMA ordered him to be reinstated on an indefinite or permanent basis.
It is therefore important that an employer enters into fixed-term employment contracts which meet the requirements of the LRA.
Where a fixed-term contract has already been concluded, the employer should take into account that renewal of a fixed-term contract is also required to be justifiable in terms of section 198B of the LRA. Should the renewal(s) not be linked to a justifiable reason, an employee may claim to have been dismissed upon the end of the period where the terms are not renewed.
For employees, it is important to know at what point you could claim to have a reasonable expectation of your fixed term contract being renewed. Important factors which are considered include:
At Pagdens Attorneys we assist with the drafting of fixed-term employment contracts as well as contracts of employment on a permanent basis. We further assist individuals and entities with all labour law matters. Should you require any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us at info@pagdens.co.za or 041 502 7200 or https://www.pagdens.co.za/contact/.
This article is for general information should not be used or relied on as legal or other professional advice. No liability can be accepted for any errors or omissions nor for any loss or damage arising from reliance upon any information herein. Always contact an attorney for specific and detailed advice. Errors and omissions excepted (E&OE)
| Cookie | Duration | Description |
|---|---|---|
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional | 11 months | The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-others | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. |
| cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance | 11 months | This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". |
| viewed_cookie_policy | 11 months | The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data. |
Pagdens and specifically past commercial director Jean Opperman has given our company the very best legal support and advice over the last five years. They have helped us to navigate two particularly complex issues in our business with huge success, the last one being the sale of the business.
Jean and the Pagdens team has uncompromising integrity, business ethics and incredible depth of legal knowledge. She has a sharp intellect that enables her to cut through all the nonsense and crystallise the most important aspects to others – whether it be the legal team of the opposition or the very non-legally minded client! She is tenacious and ensures that issues are sorted out as simply as possibly. Apart from it being an absolute pleasure to work with Pagdens, it is also refreshing that one receives reasonable bills. Working with other law firms I have always resented their astronomic fees. I cannot recommend Pagdens highly enough.
Quest Petroleum operates within the energy sector and more particularly, within the petroleum industry. Our business entails complex transactions which require sound, tailor made and robust legal advice. We have been instructing Pagdens since 2014. Our instructions range from drafting of agreements, conveyancing, litigation, collections and general commercial advice.
The Pagdens team consists of a senior, experienced contingent as well as a younger guard bursting with legal knowledge. The attorneys are underpinned by friendly and competent secretaries, personal assistants and administration staff. The Pagdens team has always provided us with well-considered and sound legal advice. Their knowledge of law is always informed by the latest legal developments.
Our matters are in the main urgent in nature. Pagdens team deals with each matter with the necessary urgency without compromising on the quality of correspondence and process which ultimately go out. The aim is always to obtain the best commercial result. In contrast to other firms, Pagdens believes in value billing. As a result, their clients remain loyal and keep referring matters and also other acquaintances. We continue to enjoy a legal service superior to what we have experience anywhere else.
Will be in touch soon.